|
Complex Structured Assets: Feds Propose New House Rules May 24, 2004 The OCC, OTS, Federal Reserve, FDIC and SEC are worried. On May 13th, the five regulators issued a joint statement and request for public comment on a proposed new round of internal controls and risk management procedures to reign in financial institutions that engage in complex structured finance activities (aka “derivatives”). Here is the draft proposal and below our take on this technical but significant pronouncement. After having encouraged the use of imaginary securities in the 1990’s as a way to offset risk in volatile markets, regulators now evidence a degree of alarm. The proposed statement is a grim admission that Elvis has left the building. For example: “In light of recent events, the OCC, Board, and SEC conducted special reviews of several banking and securities firms that are significant participants in the market for complex structured finance products. These reviews were designed to evaluate the product approval, transaction approval, and other internal controls and processes used by these institutions to identify and manage the legal, reputational, and other risks associated with complex structured finance transactions.” The proposed text seems focused on the idea that the banks have gone too far with existing activities. Most of the language is about reigning in the troops and making managers and directors accountable a la Sarbanes-Oxley. Yet the proposed statement suggests that the SEC and other regulators consider derivatives dealing activities appropriate and, indeed, co-equal with the other activities a financial institution may conduct. This is like equating casino gambling with productive employment and commerce. Have our standards fallen so far that we wish to publicly embrace this view? Derivatives shift wealth opportunistically. The theory behind them is to stabilize risk in volatile markets by providing a means to rectify a portion of the losses incurred in less liquid activities. However, every transaction produces a winner and a loser. In other words, 50% of market activity results in a realized loss to one party. Thus derivatives enable smarter firms with deeper talent pools to exploit lesser players. Herein lies the flaw for the financial industry. While volatility is stabilized for a few, the net effect on the system is that the losses are merely passed to the dumbest player at the table. The reality is that most banks and non-bank financial institutions do not have the scale, internal systems and, most important, human resources needed to profitably play at the derivatives table. If organizations the size of Fannie Mae (NYSE:FNM) cannot manage the duration risk of a mortgage portfolio, what makes the regulators think that the vast majority of smaller institutions can do any better playing in the world of customized derivatives contracts, the type of dealings made infamous by Enron? Why are the SEC and other agencies publishing this ridiculous proposal? Because the derivatives markets feed on a steady flow of new, inferior players, as in the case of smaller financial institutions less adept than the larger dealer banks. When the SEC and other regulators propose to issue guidelines for how financial institutions can “safely” engage in derivatives dealing activities, they are effectively acting as shills for the largest money center banks, bringing new suckers to the derivatives table to keep the game growing. Because derivatives are so important to the profitability of large dealers like JP Morgan (NYSE:JPM), Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) and Citigroup (NYSE:C), regulators have no choice but to encourage the use of imaginary securities. Yet spreads have collapsed and three big banks now control most of the market. These banks measure their “notional” profits in mere basis points. Rather than encourage financial institutions to deploy capital in derivatives activities, the regulators instead should consider why the business models of the major financial houses seem to be increasingly focused on gaming in the first place. About IRA Products and Services IRA offers advanced analytics for risk surveillance and investment research via subscription products such as the IRA Bank Monitor for Professionals covering the US banking industry and the IRA Corporate Monitor covering public companies. For a trial subscription or an on-line demonstration, please register here. IRA Advisory Services including our channel research and diligence support services are available to qualified clients. For more information, please contact our offices. IRA for ConsumersIRA provides consumers easy to buy online reports to independently check on their banks via our How's My Bank? system. IRA on Web 2.0For updates during the week please follow IRA www.twitter.com/IRABankMonitor. The Institutional Risk Analyst is published by Lord, Whalen LLC (LW) and may not be reproduced, disseminated, or distributed, in part or in whole, by any means, outside of the recipient's organization without express written authorization from LW. It is a violation of federal copyright law to reproduce all or part of this publication or its contents by any means. This material does not constitute a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any securities or investments. The opinions expressed herein are based on publicly available information and are considered reliable. However, LW makes NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY SORT with respect to this report. Any person using this material does so solely at their own risk and LW and/or its employees shall be under no liability whatsoever in any respect thereof. |
FREE UNTIL 12/31/2009
|
|
A Professional Services Organization Copyright 2009 - Lord, Whalen LLC - All Rights Reserved |